When super alone is not enough
Superannuation can be a tax effective way to invest for retirement. With changes to superannuation coming into effect on 1 July 2017, there may be some limits and constraints with superannuation and some investors and financial advisers may be looking for an alternative tax effective structure like an investment bond.
Case study: What’s next when superannuation contributions have been maximised
Anthony is 45 years old and has invested wisely in the property market. However, he now believes that property returns have plateaued and has therefore sold his inner-city investment property and realised a healthy capital gain.
He has paid off his mortgage and maximised his superannuation contributions, both concessional and non-concessional contributions.
Anthony wants to know how to best invest his surplus proceeds of $200,000 tax effectively to generate the potential for solid returns. He earns a good income and does not need access to his funds and therefore can adopt a long-term investment time horizon of 10 years plus.
He considers investing in Australian shares either via a managed fund, directly in the sharemarket or via his family trust, and taking advantage of franking credits that can reduce the tax paid which is important to him given that he is on the highest marginal tax rate.
His adviser suggests that he can still access the benefits of franking credits from Australian shares and access a tax effective structure, by investing the funds in an investment bond (Australian shares option), which pays a maximum tax of 30%. However, the franking credits from the shares can reduce the effective tax rate paid by the investment bond.
In addition, Anthony can afford to invest additional amounts of $10,000 into the investment bond for the first three years as he is unable to direct any surplus funds into superannuation without exceeding his contribution caps. In three years’ time, he plans on reducing this annual contribution amount he invests to $5,000 per year.
His adviser confirms that he can redeem his investment bond and pay no additional tax after 10 years from the initial investment provided the additional contributions do not exceed 125% of the previous year’s contributions.
When Anthony reaches age 55, the investment bond has accumulated to approximately $551,6461 (tax paid). This is estimated to be $35,763 higher than the alternative of investing at his personal marginal tax rate.
The net sum available in the investment bond in 10 years’ time by comparison to the same return achieved within a managed fund tax structure that is taxed at Anthony’s marginal tax rate is shown in the graph on the following page. It is important to note that this is illustrative example based on specific assumptions noted. Advisers are encouraged to consider the assumptions and run their own calculations.
Provided for illustrative example only based on the basic income and growth assumptions described above. This illustrative example does not purport to represent the actual return possible in any of Centuria Investment Bonds. An investment is subject to risk, the degree of which depends on the assets in which the bond invests. Assumptions: 1. Total returns of 8.5% (4.5% income (80% franked), 4% capital growth) per annum, 100% annual turnover of the portfolio, 50% CGT discount applies for managed fund.
• Doesn’t take into account the fees of any structure. Fees may impact materially on the final outcome.
• The composition of income vs growth in a return will also have an impact on the outcome. Generally, the higher the growth component the greater the benefit of CGT tax discounting for an investment through the managed fund structure. This will change the outcome.
• Advisers are encouraged to undertake their own research based on the risk tolerances and investments to be selected by their clients.
If Anthony had chosen to invest the $200,000 into a discretionary family trust rather than investing the funds in a managed fund in his own name, the results would essentially be the same as investing in his own name. This is because the discretionary trust does not pay tax as the earnings are passed onto the beneficiaries and they pay tax at their marginal tax rate.
A discretionary family trust can provide the ability to choose who to make the distributions to if there are multiple beneficiaries on different marginal tax rates. However, an investment bond can be a more attractive option considering:
Anthony is the only beneficiary; and
The complexity and cost of establishing and running a trust e.g. costs of producing annual financial and tax accounts.
|Benefits of an investment bond:|
You can download a PDF of the strategy here.
Disclaimer: Centuria’s Investment Bonds offer a tax effective investment vehicle outside of superannuation. They have features that investors should consider if they wish to invest outside of superannuation. Suitability of an investment in a Centuria Investment Bond will depend on a person’s circumstances, financial objectives and needs, none of which have been taken into consideration in this advertisement. Prospective investors should obtain and read a copy of the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and consider the information in the PDS in light of their circumstances, objectives and needs before making a decision to invest. We recommend that prospective investors consult with their financial adviser. This document is not an offer to invest in any of Centuria’s Investment Bonds. Investment in Centuria’s Investment Bonds are subject to risk as detailed in the PDS. Centuria will receive fees in relation to an investment in its Investment Bonds. Issued by Centuria Life Limited ABN 79 087 649 054 AFSL 230867.