You are now leaving Centuria Australia
and entering Centuria New Zealand.

Australia’s agriculture sector offers far more than crops—it’s a gateway to dynamic livestock markets that underpin global food security.
Among these, chickens and pigs stand out as efficient, high-demand protein sources with features that may appeal to investors. These types of livestock combine shorter production cycles, resource-efficient operations and modern biosecure facilities, which can support more consistent supply and strong alignment with consumer trends for lean, affordable proteins.
For those seeking diversification and exposure to resilient demand drivers, investing in poultry and pork may represent a compelling opportunity.
Cattle and sheep are the most visible part of Australian livestock agriculture. These ruminant animals rely on grazing land, with production outcomes heavily influenced by rainfall, pasture quality and land carrying capacity. Production cycles are long, increasing exposure to seasonal and climatic variability.
Poultry includes birds such as chickens, turkeys and duck however the industry is dominated by chickens. Operations are built around controlled‑environment facilities designed to optimise temperature, hygiene, feed and animal health. Production cycles are short, supporting consistent supply, rapid stock turnover and faster adjustment to market demand.
Pork similarly operates within highly managed facilities that emphasise the health and feed efficiency of pigs along with strict biosecurity standards. As with poultry, pork has shorter production cycles than grazing livestock and relies on purpose‑built infrastructure and operational expertise.
Australia also produces a range of other livestock including goats, deer, camel and specialty birds. These sectors vary by region and market demand and are much smaller in scale than cattle, sheep, poultry and pork.
Demand for protein continues to grow in line with population growth, rising incomes and evolving dietary preferences. In Australia, chicken has the highest per‑capita consumption of any meat due to its affordability, versatility and suitability for everyday meals. Pork also benefits from wide use across retail, food service and processed food categories.
Consumers continue to shift towards lean, value‑for‑money proteins, coupled with growing expectations around food safety, traceability and production integrity. The controlled production systems and integrated supply chains in poultry and pork support consistent quality and transparency, meeting these expectations effectively.
Environmental performance varies significantly across livestock industries. A key distinction is feed conversion efficiency, one of the most material sustainability metrics referenced in broader supply‑chain analysis. Poultry and pigs, as monogastric animals, convert feed into protein far more efficiently than ruminants such as cattle and sheep.
Other key distinctions include energy and water use, waste and nutrient management, emissions reporting where available and practices that reduce loss and improve efficiency over time. In poultry and pork, controlled production systems can make monitoring and reporting more consistent, because feed, water, housing conditions and site processes are managed within defined settings.
Over the past three decades, the Australian chicken meat industry has nearly halved the amount of feed required to produce a kilogram of meat1. That efficiency improvement can reduce pressure on land, water and energy. It may also lower emissions per unit of protein. According to Agrifutures Australia1, the Australian chicken meat industry, chicken carries the lowest environmental footprint of any mainstream land-based protein in Australia, measured across carbon emissions, water use and land occupation.
The pork sector tells a similar story. Industry data shows Australian pork producers have cut their carbon footprint by more than 60% since 1980, alongside an 80% reduction in water use2.
For investors assessing sustainability credentials, the practical question is not whether the livestock sector has no impact, but what systems are in place to measure key indicators, meet regulatory requirements and improve performance over time.
All livestock operations are influenced by planning and zoning regulations. While poultry and pig farms typically require less land, large grazing enterprises such as cattle and sheep need significant acreage and may face different approval processes. Zoning rules, buffer requirements (including odour, biosecurity and environmental setbacks), traffic access and proximity to processors and feed supply are important across the board. In addition, reliable access to essential services like water, power and wastewater management is crucial for site suitability, regardless of livestock type.
Livestock enterprises are capital‑intensive and depend on specialised, fit‑for‑purpose infrastructure. For poultry and pork this includes climate‑controlled housing, automated feeding and watering systems, ventilation and waste management. For grazing livestock, infrastructure typically includes fencing, yards, water systems and handling facilities. Build quality, asset design and long-term maintainability materially influence performance and residual value.
Operational expertise is fundamental across all livestock types. Successful management of animal health, nutrition, staffing, compliance and quality control require specialist skills and experience. Strong operators tend to have clear procedures, regular monitoring, staff training and effective incident response planning to maintain standards and manage risks.
Disease prevention and management are critical in every livestock sector, making disease a key risk of investing in livestock. While the more controlled environments of poultry and pig farms help mitigate risks through hygiene protocols and site controls, grazing animals such as cattle and sheep face different disease profiles and exposure risks due to outdoor conditions and interactions with wildlife. Proactive biosecurity measures, ongoing surveillance and contingency planning are vital across all operations.
Feed and energy can be significant operating costs for poultry and pork, but grazing livestock also contend with variable costs including pasture management, supplementary feeding (particularly during drought or winter) and transport. Across all livestock sectors, when input prices rise, margins can compress. Market volatility, processing capacity and logistics can also affect timing and commercial outcomes, depending on the structure of supply arrangements.
Poultry and pork differ from grazing-based sectors in three practical ways.
First, they tend to be resource efficient. Poultry and pigs convert feed into protein efficiently compared with many other livestock types. That can translate into lower land requirements per unit of output, which matters as land, water and environmental constraints increase.
Second, their production cycles are shorter. This efficiency is particularly relevant as a growing global middle class drives higher demand for lean, affordable proteins, making these sectors a critical part of food security infrastructure. Supply can respond more quickly to changes in demand, which reduces reliance on long, weather-dependent timelines.
Third, these sectors rely on purpose-built, biosecure facilities. Controlled environments support close monitoring, consistent operating conditions and stronger management of animal health. Welfare standards and compliance requirements are embedded into facility design and operating procedures.
Understanding these basics can provide a clearer foundation for investors considering investing in chickens and pigs as part of a broader agricultural allocation. They stand out because they are efficient, operate on short production cycles and are built around modern, biosecure facilities that support consistent operating conditions.
Please complete the form to register your interest in receiving updates on future unlisted property fund opportunities.